Codex / Claude Code
The coding agent runs in a terminal or IDE and receives a Java feature request.
Java customer development workflow
Interactive view of how Codex uses K2 collections, Agents, Knowledge Feed, and Pipeline context before producing a Java patch for a legacy-style R&D workflow.
K2 does not replace Codex. It gives the coding agent a controlled path to private, versioned, and source-grounded evidence before planning or editing.
The coding agent runs in a terminal or IDE and receives a Java feature request.
A repo-local MCP process exposes K2 tools while keeping credentials in environment variables.
K2 applies metadata filters, dense/sparse retrieval, and specialized guide, docs, code, and architect agents.
Confluence-style rules, legacy Java source, tests, ADRs, API docs, and examples stay in separate corpora.
Codex receives evidence-backed context before producing a patch and a verification trail.
Codex should identify guardrails, Flink 2.2 docs, Java implementation anchors, route registration, message classes, and tests before editing code.